Commons:Featured picture candidates
Other featured candidates
📽️ Media
|
Featured picture candidates Featured picture candidates are images that the community will vote on, to determine whether or not they will be highlighted as some of the finest on Commons. This page lists the candidates to become featured pictures. The picture of the day images are selected from featured pictures. Old candidates for featured pictures are listed here. There are also chronological lists of featured pictures: 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, 2026 and current month. For another overview of our finest pictures, take a look at our annual picture of the year election. |
|||||||||||||||||||
Formal thingsNominatingGuidelines for nominatorsPlease read the complete guidelines before nominating. This is a summary of what to look for when submitting and reviewing FP candidates:
Artworks, illustrations, and historical documentsThere are many different types of non-photographic media, including engravings, watercolors, paintings, etchings, and various others. Hence, it is difficult to set hard-and-fast guidelines. However, generally speaking, works can be divided into three types: Those that can be scanned, those that must be photographed, and those specifically created to illustrate a subject. Works that must be photographed include most paintings, sculptures, works too delicate or too unique to allow them to be put on a scanner, and so on. For these, the requirements for photography, below, may be mostly followed; however, it should be noted that photographs which cut off part of the original painting are generally not considered featurable. Works that may be scanned include most works created by processes that allow for mass distribution − for instance, illustrations published with novels. For these, it is generally accepted that a certain amount of extra manipulation is permissible to remove flaws inherent to one copy of the work, since the particular copy – of which hundreds, or even thousands of copies also exist – is not so important as the work itself. Works created to serve a purpose include diagrams, scientific illustrations, and demonstrations of contemporary artistic styles. For these, the main requirement is that they serve their purpose well. Provided the reproduction is of high quality, an artwork generally only needs one of the following four things to be featurable:
Digital restorations must also be well documented. An unedited version of the image should be uploaded locally, when possible, and cross-linked from the file description page. Edit notes should be specified in detail, such as "Rotated and cropped. Dirt, scratches, and stains removed. Histogram adjusted and colors balanced." PhotographsOn the technical side, we have focus, exposure, composition, movement control and depth of field.
On the graphic elements we have shape, volume, color, texture, perspective, balance, proportion, noise, etc.
You will maximise the chances of your nominations succeeding if you read the complete guidelines before nominating. Video and audioPlease nominate videos, sounds, music, PDFs, etc. at Commons:Featured media candidates. Set nominationsIf a group of images are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set. A set should fall under one of the following types:
Adding a new nominationIf you believe that you have found or created an image that could be considered valuable, with appropriate name, quality, image description, categories and licensing, then do the following. Step 1: copy the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Your image filename.jpg. Then click on the "create new nomination" button. All single files: For renominations, simply add /2 after the filename. For example, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
All set nomination pages should begin "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/", e.g. "Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/My Nomination".
Step 3: manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list: Click here, and add the following line to the TOP of the nominations list:
Nominations are time-sensitive and for one-time use only. An automatic clock starts as soon as they are created. Do not create them in advance, save them for later or re-activate them. Galleries and FP categories: Please add a gallery page and section heading from the list at Commons FP galleries. Write the code as Page name#Section heading. For example: Optional: if you are not the creator of the image, please notify them using
An 'Alternative' is created by adding a sub-section to the nomination page: ====Alternative==== VotingEditors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 100 constructive, stable edits on Commons (excluding user and talk pages) can vote. Everybody can vote for their own nominations. Anonymous (IP) votes are not allowed. You may use the following templates:
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator. A well-written review helps participants (photographers, nominators and reviewers) improve their skills by providing insight into the strengths and weaknesses of a picture. Explain your reasoning, especially when opposing a candidate (which has been carefully selected by the author/nominator). English is the most widely understood language on Commons, but any language may be used in your review. A helpful review will often reference one or more of the criteria listed above. Unhelpful reasons for opposing include:
Remember also to put your signature (~~~~). Featured picture delisting candidatesOver time, featured picture standards change. It may be decided that for some pictures which were formerly "good enough", this is no longer the case. This is for listing an image which you believe no longer deserves to be a featured picture. For these, vote:
This can also be used for cases in which a previous version of an image was promoted to FP, but a newer version of the image has been made and is believed to be superior to the old version, e.g. a newly edited version of a photo or a new scan of a historical image. In particular, it is not intended for replacing older photos of a particular subject with newer photos of the same subject, or in any other case where the current FP and the proposed replacement are essentially different images. For these nominations, vote:
If you believe that some picture no longer meets the criteria for FP, you can nominate it for delisting, copying the image name into this box, after the text already present in the box: In the new delisting nomination page just created you should include:
After that, you have to manually insert a link to the created page at the top of Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list. As a courtesy, leave an informative note on the talk page(s) of the original creator, uploader(s), and nominator with a link to the delisting candidate. {{subst:FPC-notice-removal}} can be used for this purpose. Featured picture candidate policyGeneral rules
Featuring and delisting rulesA candidate will become a featured picture in compliance with following conditions:
The delisting rules are the same as those for FPs, with voting taking place over the same time period. The rule of the 5th day is applied to delisting candidates that have received no votes to delist, other than that of the proposer, by day 5. The FPCBot handles the vote counting and closing in most cases, current exceptions are candidates containing multiple versions of the image as well as FPXed and withdrawn nominations. Any experienced user may close the requests not handled by the bot. For instructions on how to close nominations, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/What to do after voting is finished. Also note that there is a manual review stage between when the bot has counted the votes and before the nomination is finally closed by the bot; this manual review can be done by any user familiar with the voting rules. Above all, be politePlease don't forget that the image you are judging is somebody's work. Avoid using phrases like "it looks terrible" and "I hate it". If you must oppose, please do so with consideration. Also remember that your command of English might not be the same as someone else's. Choose your words with care. Happy judging… and remember… all rules can be broken. See also
| |||||||||||||||||||
Table of contents
All users eligible to vote on FPC are invited to vote on this page.
The voting is open until 17 March 2026 23:59:59 (UTC).
Featured picture candidates
Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2026 at 09:57:30 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Bolivia
Info Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia. Сreated by Abel Maestro Garcia, uploaded/nominated by me Юрий Д.К. 09:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment The view is great and the subject magic, but apart from the tilt the processing is not really at FP level Poco a poco (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The subject and perspective are very appealing, and the composition works well. Slight oversaturation and heavy denoising/sharpening reduce fine details, so the technical quality does not fully meet FP standards. I'm sorry. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:09, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2026 at 09:57:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
Info Domes of St. Basil's Cathedral, view from Middle Trade Rows. My photo Юрий Д.К. 09:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality, but no wow for me. Trees are nothing special in itself and only seem to obscure important details. Harsh midday light. --A.Savin 10:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- "Trees are nothing special in itself" - Lol. Probably coconut trees or baobabs should be here. Юрий Д.К. 10:49, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 23 Mar 2026 at 01:17:35 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family_:_Ericaceae
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Info Weathered tree stump covered with moss and lichen, surrounded by blooming Spring heath (Erica carnea) in the Grugapark in Essen, Germany
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 01:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful out-of-focus areas and nice colors. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:05, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not even the central subject is focused. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:09, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2026 at 21:38:38 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info I hope that the minimalism in symmetrically presenting these identical-looking, yet subtly different, windows on a simple wall with rich textures is appealing. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:38, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Tuxyso (talk) 08:12, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2026 at 20:29:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Others
Info Mundari boy collecting burnt cow dung after dawn in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. The ash is used by the Mundari as a mosquito repellent and also for cosmetic purposes. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:29, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I'll finish the series of South Sudan with an experiment in W&B. Poco a poco (talk) 20:29, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great photo! (Minor point: Isn't he collecting the burnt dung, rather than recollecting [which usually means remembering] it?) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Fixed, thank you Ikan Kekek Poco a poco (talk) 09:26, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:39, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support B&W is a good choice here. The colors weren't of much interest (though I would still support the version of color). JayCubby (talk) 00:54, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support B&W and dust haze makes this special. --Tagooty (talk) 04:01, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Undoubtlessly a stunning series although the motifs are very similiar. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:14, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 12:11, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2026 at 10:27:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#India
Info created and uploaded by Joydeep Chakraborty – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:27, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:27, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Unsharp, not special enough to deserve the star.Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:27, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Weak support for the architecture. ★ 18:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment The dome appears to be leaning to the left. Does it actually do that? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Pinging @Joydeep: to take a look. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:37, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Interesting architecture. But I see color banding/posterization in the sky. I've noticed that the first version has no such issue. I know that posterization may appear due to repeated multiple editing of an original JPG (it is lossy format) Юрий Д.К. 20:22, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I believe that the metal structures spoil the view stealing the spirit of an ancient temple view Poco a poco (talk) 10:38, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2026 at 08:29:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Morocco
Info Oued N'fis river valley upstream from the Yacoub el Mansour reservoir, low water after several years drought. Shot into the evening sun. Ouirgane, Morocco. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:29, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 08:29, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The image looks washed out due to the difficult lighting. There is also too much overexposure in the sky. Poco a poco (talk) 12:26, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 22 Mar 2026 at 01:25:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Nudes
Info created by Victor Meirelles – uploaded by Tetraktys – nominated by ★ -- ★ 01:25, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ★ 01:25, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:55, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Meirelles good as always. --heylenny (talk/edits) 20:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 21 Mar 2026 at 11:32:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Thailand
Info created by – uploaded by – nominated by Don -- (talk) 11:32, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Don (talk) 11:32, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent quality but needs categories.--Ermell (talk) 11:44, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I have added some basic categories. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:33, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good, and nice to have room around. --Yann (talk) 14:20, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Pudelek (talk) 16:01, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Southeast Asian architecture! This is what we need! ★ 16:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support as above. JayCubby (talk) 21:35, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good. However, it looks COM:OVERCAT now. I'll delete Category:Buddhism, for example. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:33, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good photo. I've removed redundant cats Юрий Д.К. 00:19, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice light and interesting temple -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:15, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support as per others above. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:59, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good capture! The sharpness and details are amazing and it's a very nice temple with a high educational value. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:19, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking composition. --Tagooty (talk) 08:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:05, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but the overdone perspective correction is disturbing to me. It would look much more natural with slight convergent verticals. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Alvesgaspar, @Famberhorst, @Heylenny, just out of curiosity, since I also take a lot of architectural photos myself and pay close attention to correct perspective in post-processing:
Honestly, I’m surprised that a tilted perspective is now being requested in an architectural image, since it’s generally criticized in nominations and leads to rejections — even in the current ones. I also recall the author’s previous nomination of this subject, where the tilted perspective was criticized not only by me. And the much too tight crop too. Because of these critics he now has revisited the motif and produced a very fine image of it for Commons. But seriously, now the old version is good enough after all?
Since there are already several alternatives of this motif featuring a tilted perspective and a tighter crop, which one would you prefer for a nomination, or as an alternative addition to this nomination here? Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- @SyntaxysI would never reject this beautiful photo, but I think that from this angle it would look more natural if the outer verticals were angled inwards just a tiny bit.In the previous photo, the verticals were corrected way too much in my opinion.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- It’s fine, I’m just asking out of general interest. When I stand in front of a building in real life and look up at it, I see lines that are 100% vertical — nothing tilts backward or converges. To me, that’s the most natural view of a building.
- I learned photography over 30 years ago from an architectural photographer. Back then, we used 4x5 inch and 8x10 inch bellows cameras from Linhof for our work, which allowed us to easily make corrections even for shots on celluloid; nothing could be corrected digitally at that time. And such perfect corrections were expressly requested by the clients — it was a must. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:21, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
EDIT: I was looking through some old photos and found a good example of how architectural photos were taken correctly as far back as 140 years ago. It serves as an excellent comparison to this photo here. In both images, the viewpoint is from ground level! In the old photo, the photographer at least shifted the lens to avoid converging lines. If that wasn’t enough, the Scheimpflug principle was used:
The rear standard (the film plane) was tilted backward until it was exactly vertical again (parallel to the building wall). Since tilting the film plane caused a loss of sharpness, the front standard (the lens) also had to be adjusted accordingly to bring the plane of focus back onto the building. The building is now depicted without converging lines, even though the camera is actually “looking up.” Today, this very photographic principle is achieved through digital correction. The result is the same. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 08:48, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- Photography is much more than a dry depiction of reality based on rigid technical rules, it is an interpretation of reality. And this fashionable obsession of making all verticals parallel, which has invaded QIC, is particularly irritating to an old photographer like me. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- @SyntaxysI would never reject this beautiful photo, but I think that from this angle it would look more natural if the outer verticals were angled inwards just a tiny bit.In the previous photo, the verticals were corrected way too much in my opinion.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:57, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Stunning photo. Perhaps you could correct the photo vertically slightly.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:47, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Neutral I agree with Famberhorst about the PC. Also, I'd crop a little at the top. --heylenny (talk/edits) 20:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Colors are beautiful. Even the wide sky at the top works very well from a compositional point of view. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:16, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2026 at 23:36:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Tapiridae (Tapirs)
Info created and uploaded by LuizAlves1990, nominated by me -- Yacàwotçã (talk) 23:36, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Yacàwotçã (talk) 23:36, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Foto incrível deste animal de hábitos noturnos (que parece estar um pouco machucado
)! ★ 01:15, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The lighting is terrible. I understand that this is a night shot with a strong flash, but I donÇt see for that since this is not a nocturnal animal Poco a poco (talk) 12:09, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- This is a primarily nocturnal animal. ★ 14:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It is, but we just recently featured a great photo taken just before sunset. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:06, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- This is a primarily nocturnal animal. ★ 14:47, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose White spots in the eyes and artificial flash light spoil this portrait, unfortunately -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:11, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Giles's tapir is much better lightwise. JayCubby (talk) 18:36, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2026 at 23:32:33 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Rodrigo.Argenton, nominated by me -- Yacàwotçã (talk) 23:32, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Yacàwotçã (talk) 23:32, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Apart from the red halos / CA and the lack of sharpness I find this POV not really appealing for a church (altar) Poco a poco (talk) 12:11, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support It's a really beautiful church. There's a lot of history here. I had considered nominating it (it's in my favorites), but I'm not sure about the crop. Anyway, it's a very good photo for something taken in 2016. --heylenny (talk/edits) 00:15, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by very good for 2016. I'm sure you'll agree that people were taking great photos of church interiors in and before 2016. For example, this is a work by Diliff from 2014. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Nice shot! heylenny (talk/edits) 13:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Indeed. And one of many by him. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:21, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- Nice shot! heylenny (talk/edits) 13:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you mean by very good for 2016. I'm sure you'll agree that people were taking great photos of church interiors in and before 2016. For example, this is a work by Diliff from 2014. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:12, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Poor image quality. And lowering the camera to near the floor was not a good idea. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:23, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others, QI seal is not really deserved either. --A.Savin 10:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2026 at 22:47:06 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United Arab Emirates
Info created by Robert Haandrikman – uploaded by Mario1952 – nominated by ★ -- ★ 22:47, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Huge panorama with a high resolution and a spectacular view. -- ★ 22:47, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks, good find. Works for me. Somewhat harsh light in places and unforgiving rocks, but it's in a desert. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:16, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- I'm trying to diversify the candidates by nominating/suggesting images from other regions of the world, such as the Middle East and China. ★ 00:59, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- I know, and it's fundamentally a good idea. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- I'm trying to diversify the candidates by nominating/suggesting images from other regions of the world, such as the Middle East and China. ★ 00:59, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:52, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:35, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice find.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:15, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 00:26, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking panoramic composition. The rugged mountain textures, calm water surface and clear reflections create strong depth and visual balance, while the wide format effectively conveys the scale and isolation of this desert reservoir. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:02, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:00, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose A very good quality photo of a nice place. But the composition seems boring and the foregrounds on the left and right are disturbing. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:33, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment given how many pixels we have here, how about a crop on left and right to remove the near side of the shores? —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:00, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per Ikan Kekek and Radomianin. --heylenny (talk/edits) 20:28, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose With Alvesgaspar plus more than a half of the main motif in in shadow. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:10, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I agree --Poco a poco (talk) 10:41, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2026 at 12:36:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
Info created & uploaded by Юрий Д.К. – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:36, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:36, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Pleasant but not an amazing composition to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:43, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Thank you Tomer T, for nomination! Юрий Д.К. 15:04, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Good patterns but the cropped-out bush breaks the view. ★ 16:16, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Ikan. --GRDN711 (talk) 20:52, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment I would try biger zoom and compo of air and wall. Grass, tree, white line spoil it.--Mile (talk) 16:07, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Composition doesn't work for me. And limited wow factor -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2026 at 10:34:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info uploaded and nominated by myself -- Umarxon III (talk) 10:40, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 16:15, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Umarxon III (talk) 08:54, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose A good quality, but trivial portrait. Nothing featurable here. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:34, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I concur with Alvesgaspar. --heylenny (talk/edits) 20:27, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2026 at 09:37:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Turdidae (Thrushes)
Info created & uploaded by Pdanese – nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:37, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:37, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry. I just saw this. Thank you so much. It's very kind of you. I'm going to abstain (as author). Thank you, again. Pdanese (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment There is one existing FP of this species, which I think is a bit better than this, with more detail in the feathers: File:Veery in CP (43277).jpg. There are also some excellent QIs. My favorites are File:20250701 veery pleasant valley wildlife sanctuary PD206480.jpg or the similar File:20250701 veery pleasant valley wildlife sanctuary PD206488.jpg, which show the bird singing and have excellent details on the tail feathers. All that said, this is a good photo and would be fine as an FP. I'll live with it longer and consider whether to vote for it but certainly won't oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:56, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support May be better images are existing here but this one is FP for me. Юрий Д.К. 15:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose The composition is pleasing. Per Ikan, there are better images of this species. An FP of this common bird perched in good light needs better detail and sharpness. --Tagooty (talk) 08:38, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2026 at 08:09:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hydrangeaceae
Info Dried petal of a Hydrangea paniculata on the bush in February. Focus stack of 29 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:09, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:09, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:04, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:07, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive detail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:35, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:08, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support One mistake, and "one perhaps", could be solved (anoted). Anycase "s", at least background is not one-colored. --Mile (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2026 (UTC) p.S. Maybe a little crop all around to make object biger.
Done. Small correction.Thank you for your comment and support. I've made a small correction. The background is a natural backdrop of the shrub border, fallen leaves, and such. I won't be changing the size during the voting period.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:53, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Clear, balanced composition with harmonious arrangement, aesthetically concise and convincing. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice light, bokeh in the background, and high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:01, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Good technical achievement but nothing featurable here imo. Once again, this is like using a canon to kill a fly. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:02, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Apart from the fact that we don’t have any other images of a dried flower of this species in our collection, it is very well executed both technically and compositionally. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:44, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support with others. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 10:40, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2026 at 07:46:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info uploaded and nominated by myself -- Umarxon III (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Different but good portrait. ★ 16:14, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Umarxon III (talk) 00:31, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2026 at 04:27:22 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People
Info created by John Fredrick Lewis – uploaded by Soerfm, and earlier by User:Eloquence's upload bot – nominated by Pine -- ↠Pine (✉) 04:27, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ↠Pine (✉) 04:27, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination after finding an earlier nomination on ENWP which correctly pointed out compression artifacts. ↠Pine (✉) 04:38, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Mar 2026 at 04:16:18 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info created by Spicypepper999 – uploaded by Spicypepper999 – nominated by Pine -- ↠Pine (✉) 04:16, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ↠Pine (✉) 04:16, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Perspective correction needed. ★ 16:18, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Small for a panorama, nowadays. We've featured more impressive panoramas of Seattle before. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2026 at 21:41:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info Clay pit Holzbachacker near Buttenheim. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:41, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:41, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment The image has a blocky texture, maybe ease up on the processing? JayCubby (talk) 22:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, that makes sense.
Support. JayCubby (talk) 13:33, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- Ah, that makes sense.
Info Blocky is the floor through the pieces of clay--Ermell (talk) 08:51, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting texture. One may wonder if it is the soil or a cliff... Yann (talk) 09:03, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 09:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:08, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:45, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Per Yann. ★ 16:19, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:43, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Interesting texture, almost like leather. Acroterion (talk) 02:05, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:07, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:09, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:18, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per others. Also an interesting composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:58, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 10:36, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2026 at 21:02:50 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical/1900s#1940-1949
Info created by Ansel Adams – uploaded & restored by JayCubby – nominated by JayCubby -- JayCubby (talk) 21:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Note I am partial to the tones of the negative. Adams's positive print is a better representation of his style, but obscures much of the emotion through shadow.
Context During WWII, the United States forcibly incarcerated over 100,000 Japanese immigrants and American citizens of Japanese descent, while taking little action against German and Italian nationals.
Support I may have missed a few flecks, as happens with large images. After several hours lost to out-of-memory crashes, I reached a point I am happy with. JayCubby (talk) 21:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment It is a pity that the boy in the lower right spoils a perfect composition. May be it could be removed? Yann (talk) 21:16, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Cloned, @Yann. Any better? JayCubby (talk) 21:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great! --Yann (talk) 21:37, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Neutral Really great, but the baton on the right is partially cropped out. ★ 16:35, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- Indeed. Unfortunately, there is no more room in the crop, @★ JayCubby (talk) 19:07, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2026 at 17:18:03 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Yemen
Info Houses in Sana'a, Yemen. Created by Rod Waddington – firstly uploaded by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) – edited and nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:18, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Purple tinge reduced. We're unlikely to see another photo like this anytime soon due to the Yemeni civil war (2014–present). -- ★ 17:18, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Right, but that doesn't make a photo that still has a pronounced purple tint an FP. COM:VIC exists for imperfect photos that provide important documentation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- I disagree; sometimes the important documentation can surpass the quality, like a hard-to-find rare starfish. ★ 19:35, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Right, but that doesn't make a photo that still has a pronounced purple tint an FP. COM:VIC exists for imperfect photos that provide important documentation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nice photo, but Rod's uploads suffer from JPEG artificing, this included. Could our resident Yemenite weigh in on the feasibility of retaking this photo? (Alternatively, someone could pester Rod via Flickr for a relinquishment of the less compressed photos). JayCubby (talk) 20:32, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- I'll try to contact the photographer. ★ 16:38, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- @JayCubby this is Sanaa and while it is under Houthi control, the city’s been very minimally damaged due to the war, so it is somewhat possible to retake a picture like this 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 12:21, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Abo Yemen: thank you for explaining! ★ 14:55, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Same candidate as last week with low quality and very visible
chromatic aberration. -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:48, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- It's not the same; I reduced the purple tint before renominating. ★ 16:38, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Disrupting nomination per COM:FPC: "Only two active nominations by the same user". There are currently 1, 2, 3 active nominations by the same user. Sadly, one more {{FPD}} after a bunch in the past. And it happens once again after the failure of this "three active nominations proposal", many many warnings, and many many reverts. -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:48, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- I forgot to {{withdraw}} the other one. Sorry. ★ 15:34, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- Actually, it wasn't a forgetfulness; For some reason my edit wasn't saved; it seems to be an error on my pages, my apologies again. ★ 15:40, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Sorry, but sky is heavy posterized. Looks like the photographer uses strong JPG compression or something similar. I've noticed that your reсent upload has the same problem (very posterized background). It is a pity that such beautiful photo has so severe defects. Would be FP for me assuming good quality. Note that such high resolution photo (7,283×4,591) should be 15-20 MB size for high-quality image, here only 831 KB
Юрий Д.К. 21:03, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- I uploaded the image you mentioned so I could see if the JPG artifacts/posterization appeared when I uploaded it to Commons (as they didn't appear in the Flickr thumbnail), and they did. This doesn't happen in Rod's portraits (File:Girl of the Welayta people.jpg, File:Turkana Woman, Uganda (in explore) - Flickr - Rod Waddington (1).jpg, for example). ★ 21:24, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- File:Girl of the Welayta people.jpg was saved correctly by the author (16,6 MB is normal for detailed 24 MP image). Obvious JPG artifacts exist and on the Flickr thumbnail, just look closer. In regard to the nominated photo, it is only 1.84 MB (!!), which obviously wrong for 24 MP image. Юрий Д.К. 21:35, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- Right, thank you for explaining.
I withdraw my nomination ★ 22:12, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- File:Girl of the Welayta people.jpg was saved correctly by the author (16,6 MB is normal for detailed 24 MP image). Obvious JPG artifacts exist and on the Flickr thumbnail, just look closer. In regard to the nominated photo, it is only 1.84 MB (!!), which obviously wrong for 24 MP image. Юрий Д.К. 21:35, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- I uploaded the image you mentioned so I could see if the JPG artifacts/posterization appeared when I uploaded it to Commons (as they didn't appear in the Flickr thumbnail), and they did. This doesn't happen in Rod's portraits (File:Girl of the Welayta people.jpg, File:Turkana Woman, Uganda (in explore) - Flickr - Rod Waddington (1).jpg, for example). ★ 21:24, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2026 at 06:30:07 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Hamburg
Info created and uploaded by GZagatta – nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 06:30, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 06:30, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful, though I'd personally crop a bit more of the sky for a more balanced framing. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:41, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Tilted. Not QI. --E bailey (talk) 14:13, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per E bailey. Also there is at least a dust spot in the sky. --Aciarium (talk) 14:41, 10 March 2026 (UTC)- @GZagatta: Please try to fix the issues. -- XRay 💬 15:08, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Done! Many thanks for the remarks GZagatta (talk) 18:51, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- @GZagatta:
Not done I have added notes in the image where the most prominent dust spots are. Please try to clone them out. Also, there is still
Perspective distortion. --Aciarium (talk) 08:51, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- @GZagatta:
- Done! Many thanks for the remarks GZagatta (talk) 18:51, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support, thank you GZagatta for the fixes and producing a great photograph. JayCubby (talk) 20:06, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Brackenheim (talk) 09:48, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I needed to look at this at night in a dark room; then I was convinced. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:23, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Strong composition with a beautiful reflection and a very atmospheric night rendering of the Hamburg Planetarium. I carefully checked the sky at increased contrast; the mentioned dust spots are extremely faint and practically invisible in normal viewing conditions. Regarding perspective: comparing with other photographs of the building suggests the geometry largely reflects the architecture itself rather than a significant distortion. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:52, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Good for me Юрий Д.К. 20:34, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Neither overall quality nor photo in total do convince me. Water reglections always look good but a photo in complete darkness is imho not favorable here. Also some lights have e remarble green cast. A blue hour shot or a photo shortly after sunset with clear sky had been much better, see for example: File:Planetarium(Hamburg)-2025-09-msu---5106.jpg or Planetarium Hamburg zur blauen Stunde.jpg --Tuxyso (talk) 08:08, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Mar 2026 at 06:04:01 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Fungi#Family_:_Stereaceae
Info Fruit body of the Yellowing Curtain Crust (Stereum insignitum, often mistakenly referred to as S. ostrea in Europe) on a mossy dead branch of a beech tree in a mixed forest near Rheinzabern (Southern Palatinate), size of the blades approx. 2–8 cm. We don't have much images of this species and no FP, furthermore the taxonomic identity of this specimen was verified by an expert using microscopic analysis. Created, uploaded and nominated by Syntaxys -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:04, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Abstain as author -- Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:04, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:43, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:41, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 12:44, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I would have liked a slightly more generous crop on the right that didn't cut off part of the mushroom on the lower right, but these fungi are beautiful and the detail is great. Any possibility of a category for the moss? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:46, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback! The fungus has formed fruiting bodies over a length of a good 2 meters in dense proximity, so it was not possible to crop the image more generously, as other leaves would have been visible and cut off.
- Unfortunately, I cannot identify the moss; this would require microscopic examination, and the mushroom expert who verified this specimen is not familiar with mosses either. According to Google AI, it is probably Hypnum cupressiforme (cypress moss), one of the most common mosses found on bark and dead wood. Other possibilities in relation to the location in the Southern Palatinate would be Brachythecium rutabulum, Isothecium alopecuroides, and Dicranum montanum – three of them at least in the taxonomic order Hypnales.
- Identifying the dead wood is rather important when it comes to fungi, as there are lookalikes that colonize different hosts. In this case here, it would be Stereum subtomentosum, which tends to colonize alders instead of beeches but forms very similar, mostly lighter-colored fruiting bodies. Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 16:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:24, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice DOF. JayCubby (talk) 20:07, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:30, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 11:49, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support In this case I like the POV Poco a poco (talk) 13:47, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 22:58, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 08:06, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Per JayCubby.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:07, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Clear, dense composition with excellent details, aesthetically convincing and scientifically valuable. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very well portrayed textures – Julian Lupyan (talk) 15:41, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support very high quality, nice color contrast. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 10:32, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 21:24:12 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity
Info This mosaic depicts the Sun of Vergina on a centred circular background, adjoined by two Christian crosses on the sides, and one Armenian eternity sign in each corner. In Christianity, the Sun of Vergina is a symbol of Virgin Mary's perpetual virginity, while the Armenian eternity sign is associated with eternal celestial life. All by me. -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:24, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:24, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful. --B. Jankuloski (talk) 22:21, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support, and thanks for the explanation, but do please add information about when this mosaic was created, if you have any. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- I don’t have the exact date of creation, but it’s definitely a neo-Byzantine artwork. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:57, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- It's worth adding that, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:47, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Done Added in the description on the picture's page as well as on the nomination's page. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- I don’t have the exact date of creation, but it’s definitely a neo-Byzantine artwork. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 05:57, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great Macedonian artwork! ★ 00:19, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:47, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:57, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:43, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 12:44, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Aciarium (talk) 14:43, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:22, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:14, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great, graphically convincing. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Agree. --heylenny (talk/edits) 00:09, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:04, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 19:52:52 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Others
Info Mundari young man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. The Mundari are a small ethnic group of South Sudan that belong to the Karo. They have a symbiotic relationship with their Ankole-Watusi cattle, using the animals as a vital source of wealth, food, and spiritual connection, rather than for meat. The cows are central to Mundari life, providing milk for sustenance, dung for fuel (when burned to produce smoke that keeps mosquitoes and other insects away) and ash (used as a repellent and for cosmetic purposes), and acting as a form of currency for dowries. Herders dedicate their lives to protecting the prized Ankole-Watusi cows, sleeping alongside, viewing them as a living bank and a source of profound cultural significance. Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great series.--Ermell (talk) 20:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:48, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:10, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 19:38, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support as before. This series is better than most of the National Geographic sets. JayCubby (talk) 21:05, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 21:19, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ximonic (talk) 03:56, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:31, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:14, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Acroterion (talk) 02:06, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Per Jay --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent! I like the haze (dust) in the air and the motion blurred hands of the kid polishing the horn. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:42, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:05, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support exceptional good. Focus point perfectly set between horn and face, perfect exposure time (one hand is slightly unsharp showing the action the man is doing on the horn and brighter areas exactly on the horn. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:23, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 18:04:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Work#Artisans_(craftspeople)
Info Berberic painter drawing a bookmark, Ouarzazate, Morocco. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 18:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment From my experience on COM:DR, I fear the photo could be deleted because of copyright concerns over the painting, unless the author gives express written permission for the shot to be used commercially. Commons usage rights requirements are very onerous. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment From my experience you are wrong again. I forgot PR, added. Which copyright are you concerned about ? --Mile (talk) 19:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- @PetarM, the painting is a derivative work of the original, and may exceed the de minimis threshold. JayCubby (talk) 21:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- @JayCubby, Ikan Kekek You see, not here. 1st i asked him for photo(s). So i was there all time while he was drawing my notebook (i read books), it was around half hour, maybe a bit more. Before we made a sketch what i want. His drawing was on right, while i put on left side. He wanted mule, i put camel, also colors are my choice, and necklace on head was my choice - it was strange to him. I wanted sand dunes behind the Ksar (town) and above portrait of Berberic woman with that necklace, with green smaragde. Enterance to town, palms all mine. On reverse of the notebook, i was written as author too. Thanx for concerns. --Mile (talk) 07:38, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- All of that sounds fine, as far as I'm concerned. I just hope your oral account of his approval will be sufficient if there is a DR on this, and my experience is that it is unlikely to be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:42, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- @JayCubby, Ikan Kekek You see, not here. 1st i asked him for photo(s). So i was there all time while he was drawing my notebook (i read books), it was around half hour, maybe a bit more. Before we made a sketch what i want. His drawing was on right, while i put on left side. He wanted mule, i put camel, also colors are my choice, and necklace on head was my choice - it was strange to him. I wanted sand dunes behind the Ksar (town) and above portrait of Berberic woman with that necklace, with green smaragde. Enterance to town, palms all mine. On reverse of the notebook, i was written as author too. Thanx for concerns. --Mile (talk) 07:38, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- What experience, Mile? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- @PetarM, the painting is a derivative work of the original, and may exceed the de minimis threshold. JayCubby (talk) 21:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:08, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support The background painting is de minimis. --Yann (talk) 09:51, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Interesting. I wouldn't have thought you would have considered it to be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:42, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- I also think that background painting is de minimis because the photo is about the artist but not the painting. Юрий Д.К. 18:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think that's what de minimis means. See COM:DM: "De minimis use of a copyrighted work is such a trivial use that the consent of the copyright owner is not required." However, we needn't debate de minimis here. Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- I also think that background painting is de minimis because the photo is about the artist but not the painting. Юрий Д.К. 18:20, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Interesting. I wouldn't have thought you would have considered it to be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:42, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support "De minimis" and additionally unsharp --Llez (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:44, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good picture of an artist at work, so I'll support and let any possible DR take its course. I don't think the painting is de minimis, but I also assume good faith, which often seems the exception in DRs. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:50, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:51, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:29, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support as per Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:34, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 09:42:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support---Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent! Could you add the sex of either the bird and/or dragonfly? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:16, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Done for the dragonfly. As for the European bee-eaters they don't have a strong sexual dimorphism so I can't tell for sure if it's a male or female -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:35, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support, a good companion to File:Bienenfresser mit Großlibelle.jpg JayCubby (talk) 00:59, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:11, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:38, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --E bailey (talk) 14:16, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:19, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:31, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:38, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Caught at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per Basile, very well done! It looks as if the dragonfly knows what's happening and is “shield its eyes with its hands.” --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 06:38, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:06, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 09:09:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Psittacidae_(True_(African_and_New_World)_Parrots)
Info created by Giles Laurent – uploaded by Giles Laurent – nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support---Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support. Can you add a category for the tree? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Done -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:14, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:36, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I like the similarity between the yellow beak and palm plant. JayCubby (talk) 18:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:47, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 04:11, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Another Brazilian Giles Laurent's picture! ★ 04:55, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:38, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:18, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 08:43:48 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
Info all by -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 08:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Poor lighting in the foreground. CutlassCiera 15:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Still good. ★ 04:56, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support OK. --heylenny (talk/edits) 00:09, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 06:53:26 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Georgia
Info created by David1010 – uploaded by David1010 – nominated by David1010 -- David1010 06:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- David1010 06:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Interesting church and it deserves a FP, but the cross shouldn't block part of the building imho. Also, I think that perspective correction is needed here (the building is leaning back). Юрий Д.К. 17:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment WB is also pretty off. Also isnt so sharp, like focus was on cross. --Mile (talk) 18:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Info Perspective and WB corrected. ★ 16:32, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Per Юрий Д.К., it deserves a star. ★ 16:32, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:29, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 00:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Is the white balance on the church's exterior wall a bit greenish yellow? Even if not, the positioning of the cross such that it slightly hides the church is not ideal. I would have wanted to walk a little to the left to avoid that. Positioning it fully to the right of the church with a slight space between them in the picture frame would be ideal, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:19, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 06:50:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Oriolidae_(Old_World_oriole)
Info All by -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:50, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:50, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I don't know how big this bird is, but I surely believe it looks good at a larger-than-life size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:27, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- It's not a very small bird, Length: 23–25 cm (9–10 in) approximately but they spend almost all their time in the highest treetops. They rarely fly down to the lower branches or the ground. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:36, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- So this was a rare opportunity for you, and you really made the most of it! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:51, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- It's not a very small bird, Length: 23–25 cm (9–10 in) approximately but they spend almost all their time in the highest treetops. They rarely fly down to the lower branches or the ground. Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:36, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great detail, not overprocessed. JayCubby (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:48, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ximonic (talk) 03:57, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:31, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support You may have a stronger image by cropping a little tighter and removing the branch at the bottom edge. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:07, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 05:19:58 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales#Subfamily : Asteroideae
Info Seed bundle from a Helenium 'El Dorado in March. Focus stack of 19 photos. A nearly full seed bundle from a Helenium 'El Dorado' in March. Some ripe seeds have now become detached from the bundle. (Diameter of the seed bundle ~14mm.)
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:32, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Another great closeup of a part of a plant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I would put diameter into description, since many wont know about "annotations". More important than stack number. --Mile (talk) 18:08, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestion. I've added the diameter to the description.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Famberhorst, Mile meant for you to add the diameter to the description on the file page. We FPC regulars know about annotations, and this thread is not where most users will look for information about the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek,Thanks for your comment. I misunderstood it and changed it, and I think it's correct now.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestion. I've added the diameter to the description.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:13, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:49, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice details and a very good work! --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:48, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great stack, no artifact complaints. JayCubby (talk) 21:06, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:32, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2026 at 04:18:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Elegant composition; textured stone contrasts beautifully with the refined steel and figured wood handle, emphasizing form and craftsmanship. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:10, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:51, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:31, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support- Per Radomianin--Famberhorst (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:11, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support To be honest I had expected a japanese blade... Poco a poco (talk) 20:14, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Poco a poco: Do you think it might be worth nominating this one as well? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- A nice subject but I think this one is much better due to the orientation (blade to the right and closer to the camera) Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I like the other photo better and would support it. The knife in this photo is beautiful, but I haven't yet warmed to the overall composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:54, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- A nice subject but I think this one is much better due to the orientation (blade to the right and closer to the camera) Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Excellent work! --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:44, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Solid choice of rock, elegant product photo, nice tempering colors. Is it a good knife? JayCubby (talk) 21:11, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:32, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 10:22, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 21:11:46 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Canada
Info The "steeple", for lack of a better word, of the Essex Gospel Community Church in Essex, Ontario, Canada. I think this is a pleasing combination of straight lines and minimal colours (only two colours, plus black and white). All by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking architectural minimalism with strong graphic impact. Clean geometric forms guide the eye toward the cross, creating a powerful vertical emphasis. The white structure contrasts beautifully with the blue sky, while the narrow red accent provides a subtle visual anchor. Technically very well executed, with precise lines, balanced exposure, and excellent color rendering. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:37, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Excellent composition and colours. I will gladly support after the noisy sky is fixed. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:37, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment +1 --Aciarium (talk) 22:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment +1 – Julian Lupyan (talk) 23:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Alvesgaspar, Aciarium, and Julian Lupyan. I have denoised the image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 16:13, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Alvesgaspar, Aciarium, and Julian Lupyan. I have denoised the image. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 03:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:53, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Strong support Per Radomianin. Beautiful geometric composition. --Aciarium (talk) 07:37, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:28, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:31, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good compo, and that red part make it through. --Mile (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Per others.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:49, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good composed and executed, nice minimalism. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Fun photo. JayCubby (talk) 20:07, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:15, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 00:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment I won't futilely oppose, but I don't get why you all like this composition so much. If the two sides were equally high, the composition would probably work for me. Chacun à son goût. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:22, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment With Ikan, for perfect symmetry (the main theme in the photo) both side should be exactly equal. Otherwise very good. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:26, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 10:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 17:26:31 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Russia
Info Front complete view of Spasskaya Tower, built in 1491. Taken during a morning when the Red Square is free of people. My photo Юрий Д.К. 17:26, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:26, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very striking. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Perspective correction is overdone. If it were really a frontal view, then the watch would be round, but here it is oval. It looks unnatural. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- It looks like as oval from this point of view. Here the photo from similar angle. The clock would look round if you stood far away from the tower or took a picture with a drone. So, I disagree that PC is overdone. Юрий Д.К. 23:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- ...Or you can just move away and use the zoom to make the image look more natural :) I'm not voting against your photo, but I do have my opinion. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, but the correction is underdone conversely. The verticals still not vertical a bit. They are should be strictly at 90 degrees to the bottom of the frame. I suggest precise manual correction in photoshop. --Alex Florstein (talk) 05:54, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Alex Florstein No Alex, verticals doesnt need to be 90° if building is too tall and wide zoom used. Because structure become trapezoid. This method is killing photos. Some ppl express same for drone shots, from high they want 90°. --Mile (talk) 07:46, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- @PetarM But in reality the tower is absolutely strait, right? So the photo isn't represent reality well. Anyway, may be I'm too strict, I'll think about your words. --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:37, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hello, Alex. It is a very old tower and likely isn't straight completely. Very common for old buildings. Юрий Д.К. 08:47, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, Юрий. :) Of course I see you already have enough pro votes. But I really don't know, why is it questions seems so unreal for others, so please look at my version with proper geometry and proportions (in my opinion). In this edit the photo pictures exactly the same tower as I saw it in live last time. --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:40, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Done I've made a slight PC. Юрий Д.К. 17:04, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you so much!
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you so much!
- Hi, Юрий. :) Of course I see you already have enough pro votes. But I really don't know, why is it questions seems so unreal for others, so please look at my version with proper geometry and proportions (in my opinion). In this edit the photo pictures exactly the same tower as I saw it in live last time. --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:40, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hello, Alex. It is a very old tower and likely isn't straight completely. Very common for old buildings. Юрий Д.К. 08:47, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- @PetarM But in reality the tower is absolutely strait, right? So the photo isn't represent reality well. Anyway, may be I'm too strict, I'll think about your words. --Alex Florstein (talk) 08:37, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Alex Florstein No Alex, verticals doesnt need to be 90° if building is too tall and wide zoom used. Because structure become trapezoid. This method is killing photos. Some ppl express same for drone shots, from high they want 90°. --Mile (talk) 07:46, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- It looks like as oval from this point of view. Here the photo from similar angle. The clock would look round if you stood far away from the tower or took a picture with a drone. So, I disagree that PC is overdone. Юрий Д.К. 23:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:30, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:56, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Юрий Д.К. I think you should make rescale, putting more to vertical, so that clock is probably rounded. I would add some sky above and resize some pixles. Otherwise OK shot. --Mile (talk) 13:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Per Mile.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Ermell (talk) 20:52, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 18:59, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 00:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Good view of a historic building --Tagooty (talk) 08:40, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 16:12:09 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
Info created by Max Desfor, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
Info Jawaharlal Nehru sharing a joke with Mahatma Gandhi, during a meeting of the All India Congress, Mumbai, July 6, 1946. On the left is Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit, Nehru's sister.
Support Thanks to JayCubby for finding the high resolution copy. -- Yann (talk) 16:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support And thanks to Yann for so nicely restoring it! JayCubby (talk) 17:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support High encyclopedic value, captures a historically significant moment. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 22:21, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per others; a great nomination! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:16, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:18, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:29, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:28, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 15:25:44 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/1900s#1980-1989
Info Yemen's capital Sanaa before its unification (note the flag on the building). Created by mwanasimba – uploaded by File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) – nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:25, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support A little small but historically important. -- ★ 15:25, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Why not? ★ 04:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Unsharp. Decent composition, but seems more like a good souvenir snapshot to me than anything else. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:57, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Why not? ★ 04:39, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Bad light, bad crop, poor quality, low resolution. {{FPX}} -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:41, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination ★ 15:34, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 14:19:29 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
Info Mundari kid representing the horns with his hands sitting on a pile of burnt cow dung and surrounded by Watusi cows in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. The Mundari are a small ethnic group of South Sudan that belong to the Karo. They have a symbiotic relationship with their Ankole-Watusi cattle, using the animals as a vital source of wealth, food, and spiritual connection, rather than for meat. The cows are central to Mundari life, providing milk for sustenance, dung for fuel (when burned to produce smoke that keeps mosquitoes and other insects away) and ash (used as a repellent and for cosmetic purposes), and acting as a form of currency for dowries. Herders dedicate their lives to protecting the prized Ankole-Watusi cows, sleeping alongside, viewing them as a living bank and a source of profound cultural significance. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great photo! This belongs, of course, to the same series as the recent winner of POTY 2024. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 15:48, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Thanks for the picture, and the detailed explanation. --Yann (talk) 16:23, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 16:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Beautiful RiadS99 (talk) 17:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:55, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Your Sudan pictures are amazing. JayCubby (talk) 19:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good.--Ermell (talk) 20:38, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:38, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:38, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:27, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 13:46, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support It is one of the unfortunately far too few images here that really impresses me with its visual language. The mystical mood, or rather the spirituality that the image has captured, keeps the viewer enchanted for quite some time. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:35, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ximonic (talk) 03:57, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:32, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Striking with excellent composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:15, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:08, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 13:49:04 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Austria
Info Nightly view of blast furnace no. 1 of the Donawitz steelworks, Leoben, Austria. Image by me. -- Aciarium (talk) 13:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium (talk) 13:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good. This reminds me of File:Edward Weston, Armco Steel, Ohio, 1922, MoMA.jpg. Yann (talk) 17:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow. Great black-and-white work! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Good motiv but unfortunately not sharp enough. Sorry.--Ermell (talk) 20:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Sufficiently sharp for me. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:05, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful night shot. --Selbymay (talk) 22:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per others. Artistic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:15, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:26, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:05, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Per Ermell, a shame, otherwise great Poco a poco (talk) 20:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Sharpness, compo. --Mile (talk) 08:26, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Mile: Do you think composition could be improved by a suitable crop? --Aciarium (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Aciarium for compo: edge-left tower is spoiling to concetrate on right-interesting part. So i tried crop and is better to see. But despite that, i think its unsharp - not a camera problem but think "user mistake". 5 second exposure, could be shake and 600mm on f/7.1 is (almost) more portrait than landscape mode. --Mile (talk) 18:58, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Mile: I think the two towers are helpful in conveying the perspective and in framing the actual furnace - but composition is certainly a debatable topic. Sharpness could definitely be better, on this one I agree with you: The culprit was a cheap tripod, in combination with the high focal length that you mentioned. Due to the furnaces being located in a somewhat narrow valley, it is not too easy to find a good perspective with little obstruction. The few good spots are quite far away, requiring the use of such focal lengths. --Aciarium (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment @Aciarium I would re-do if possible, at least to be more sharp. --Mile (talk) 14:39, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Mile: I will certainly do so, although I might not have the chance to capture exactly these conditions (snowy forest in the background) again. Hence I will keep this nomination up. --Aciarium (talk) 18:21, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Mile: I think the two towers are helpful in conveying the perspective and in framing the actual furnace - but composition is certainly a debatable topic. Sharpness could definitely be better, on this one I agree with you: The culprit was a cheap tripod, in combination with the high focal length that you mentioned. Due to the furnaces being located in a somewhat narrow valley, it is not too easy to find a good perspective with little obstruction. The few good spots are quite far away, requiring the use of such focal lengths. --Aciarium (talk) 19:49, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Zquid (talk) 10:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2026 at 13:51:32 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Trucks_and_buses
Info A MAN TGA 18.360 clearing snow in Leoben, Austria. Image by me. -- Aciarium (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Aciarium (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 22:38:41 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Coraciiformes#Family_:_Meropidae_(Bee-eaters)
Info created & uploaded by Sven Damerow – nominated by Señor Aluminio -- Alu (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alu (talk) 22:38, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Branch has a funny texture due to AI processing being applied to an OOF object. JayCubby (talk) 22:49, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:43, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 08:44, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Excellent picture that I will happily support once what Jay pointed out is fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:35, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for your comments. The photograph is not mine and I’m not very experienced with image editing, just an amateur. If you think it is worthwhile and not too difficult, please feel free to improve the image. Thank you.Alu (talk) 10:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Weak support I prefer the version below but this one is also acceptable to me, great capture! Poco a poco (talk) 13:55, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Alternative
Info In this version, the branch texture has been slightly smoothed.
Comment @JayCubby: @Giles Laurent: Maybe it's better now? --Alu (talk) 16:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:55, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very nice. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:09, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 20:49:25 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info Used 135 film cartridges, workshop in Belgrade, Serbia. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 20:49, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 20:49, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support That's a lot of film! JayCubby (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It's a lot of film, but the composition feels random to me and is not working for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Different composition. ★ 17:49, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 19:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 17:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! Why didn't I think of taking a picture like this? --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:53, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 15:12:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Seychelles
Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 15:12, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Use categories. They cost nothing (believe it or not!!) and each one is an added value. --A.Savin 18:44, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment
Done Юрий Д.К. 10:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Thank you for the comment. I now added 3 categories: "Boats at sunset", "Photographic silhouettes of boats" and "Photographic silhouettes of people against sunsets". The photo now has a total of 11 categories (not including the hidden and temporary categories). -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 11:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Categories are satisfactory to me. This is quite an unusual aspect ratio, but I think it works well with the scenery. Beautiful light and colors. --Aciarium (talk) 13:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 17:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:45, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:45, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:08, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:24, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:22, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support – Julian Lupyan (talk) 21:54, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:50, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- XRay 💬 21:15, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice colors. --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:54, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 20:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Scutarcopagia linguafelis (Cat’s Tongue Tellin), valves
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 13:04:42 (UTC)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Tellinidae
Info The English name "Cat's Tongue Tellin" and the scientific name ("linguafelis" = cat's tongue) refer to the surface of the valves, which strongly resembles a cat's tongue; created by Llez – uploaded by Llez – nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 13:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Aptly named shell, excellent photo by Zell. JayCubby (talk) 17:53, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:09, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:50, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great shell photography as usual. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support excellent work --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:15, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:23, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Mile (talk) 13:47, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 13:51, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 08:39:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Morocco
Info Freshly-ploughed fields in the Daya Chiker polje (depression) bordered by dolomite cliffs. Created by Tagooty – uploaded by Tagooty – nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:39, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 08:39, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- BlueRockThrush (talk) 16:03, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 10:31, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment It's a pretty scene, but I'm not sure about the right crop and would like a slightly more generous crop on the near side of the picture frame, if possible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:16, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: This is the original uncropped image, and is the best I have of that scene. --Tagooty (talk) 14:38, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose per my comments. I like the photo, but it's not quite satisfying to me compositionally. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:02, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: This is the original uncropped image, and is the best I have of that scene. --Tagooty (talk) 14:38, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:22, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Ikan, composition is a bit boring -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:48, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Mar 2026 at 07:02:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United Kingdom,
Info Brutalist architectural detail on Salters' Hall in London. Created and uploaded by Julian Herzog. Nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 07:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I understand the idea, but not really working for me Poco a poco (talk) 09:57, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:26, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree. Compo is a bit out. Too many elements of architecture, black should be more in or completely out, view could be beter. --Mile (talk) 17:29, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I agree, I don't see anything that makes the image captivating or FP-level, mainly due to the composition and the dominant color scheme. HurricaneZetaC 22:45, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Composition is certainly unusual, but this is what makes this image interesting to look at. FP to me. --Aciarium (talk) 14:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Poco said it: Good idea, but the composition doesn't really work for me. I think what's doing that could be mainly the vertical that's closest. If it had been recessed, I would have reacted differently, but of course that's not a possibility. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:05, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 21:40:45 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#China
Info Drum Tower of Tianjin. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support As I said. ★ 22:38, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:44, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Looks ok, but the most interesting areas of the picture are too dark. Poco a poco (talk) 09:59, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:27, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- @★ @Kiril Simeonovski @Poco a poco @Юрий Д.К. I tried to lighten the shadows a little.--Ermell (talk) 20:48, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- Also good. ★ 21:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- Looks fine to me. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:42, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- @★ @Kiril Simeonovski @Poco a poco @Юрий Д.К. I tried to lighten the shadows a little.--Ermell (talk) 20:48, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose too tight crop left and right. --Jebulon (talk) 23:23, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- It's on point, in my view. ★ 03:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- I
Support this version with somewhat brightened shadows. Really beautiful architecture in detail. Nice to see you, Jebulon! I find the crops adequate, but I'd love to see a photo of this tower by you if you have any. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:09, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:05, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:23, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support "More than you've got to fool a nation when all I've got is precious time..." -Chinese Democracy. --heylenny (talk/edits) 00:04, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 19:04:40 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Trentino-Alto Adige
Info Valle della Rienza and Tre Cime di Lavaredo as seen from Alpe Specie, Val Pusteria, Italy. Created, uploaded and nominated by Ximonic -- Ximonic (talk) 19:04, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Abstain -- Ximonic (talk) 19:04, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great!--Ermell (talk) 21:34, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Strong support Ximonic's photos never disappoint. ★ 00:24, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 01:06, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:53, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Jakubhal 05:47, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --ArildV (talk) 07:05, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Majestic mountain scene --Tagooty (talk) 08:34, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:00, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:06, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:29, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 17:03, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Top-right rock formation looks almost manmade. JayCubby (talk) 18:48, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Is it just me, or is the image slightly tilted cw? --Aciarium (talk) 14:03, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think so. The only reliable available info is the small house near the right margin, which lools vertical to me . -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:45, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- The sediment deposits are more or less slanted everywhere in these mountains which is a bit tricky when finding a horizon. I think of trying to concider the trees, although sometimes they can be misleading too... I seem to have taken many photos in this angle, so I guess it's pretty much "there". --Ximonic (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:14, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Beautiful view and lightint -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 18:58:54 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
Info A yellow Fiat Nuova 500 on a street in San Marino. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- DILIN (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- DILIN (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The idea is not bad, but the compo (centered) is boring and the resolution is far too low Poco a poco (talk) 10:01, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- In this case, a central composition is appropriate because the object itself is static. Movement or adding some kind of dynamism makes no sense. DILIN (talk) 11:59, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support I like it. --Petro Stelte (talk) 15:53, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I'm distracted by the reflections on the side of the car, which to my mind ruin a composition that would have otherwise worked for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:24, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your opinion. You may be right, but unfortunately, this was an unstaged shoot, and I had no control over the surroundings. DILIN (talk) 17:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Of course I understand that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your opinion. You may be right, but unfortunately, this was an unstaged shoot, and I had no control over the surroundings. DILIN (talk) 17:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment @DILIN i think pic is good, but you made large crop, around 1600 px wide, so pic become a bit small. While i think car should made much more % of frame, so more crop, but i suppose you would like to have "italian backgorund" - stones etc. I have similar just more edge to edge and from lower position. --Mile (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 05:37:42 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
Info created and uploaded by Joydeep – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 05:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- An aside: the motif is quite famous in India because it appears on Indian currency notes. --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:41, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Well done. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:36, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 06:43, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support High quality image of an important motif. --Tagooty (talk) 08:35, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment We don't have yet a FP of the Konark temple, which is surprising. The place deserves it, no doubt. I find though a bit annoying that you were not perfectly in front of it but a bit to the right of the wheel. Furthermore, it needs some perspective adjustments, which could be explained by the POV, not sure Poco a poco (talk) 10:08, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
- I just promoted the image, but it was a pity not to get any feedback about my comments, next time I'll oppose to make sure my concerns are adressed before a nom gets speedy promoted. Poco a poco (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:04, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:31, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:41, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:21, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per others, including Poco's caveats. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:02, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:27, 10 March 2026 (UTC)(invalid vote made after nomination's passing —UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:51, 13 March 2026 (UTC)) I agree with Poco in that the subject deserves a better treatment. Not only the wheel should be centered and the perspective slightly corrected, but also the crop is too tight on the bottom ad top. Easy to repeat the shot, I suppose. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:46, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose- Thanks for the comment and the vote, however, per FPC rules this nomination already passed on 11 Mar 2026 at 05:37:42 (UTC) because it had completed 5 days by then and had received 10+ support votes and no opposes (otherwise known as the 5th-day rule). It wasn’t closed by the FPCBot because the bot apparently stopped working on 10 March. Pinging @Aristeas, W.carter, Yann, and A.Savin: if one of you could take a look at the bot and figure out what is wrong with it? UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:49, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 02:07:43 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Hinduism
Info created by anonymous painter c. 1760 – photographed at the Met, uploaded by BotMultichillT – nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:07, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Typical Rajput miniature of Radha Krishna, from eighteenth century, good quality reproduction. -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 02:07, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:33, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:48, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:21, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:26, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Mar 2026 at 00:03:34 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#North Macedonia
Info created by Деан Лазаревски – uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski – nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Interesting, but some
chromatic aberration, maybe the author can be stirred out of inactivity to provide the RAW? JayCubby (talk) 01:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Done Chromatic aberration removed. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks,
Support JayCubby (talk) 23:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks,
Comment An alternative version from the same photo session is this one from a slightly different perspective. Please advise if you find it more appealing. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:21, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Both perspectives are good. Interesting shape. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support ★ 22:42, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:34, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:29, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --B. Jankuloski (talk) 06:00, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:26, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:15, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:55, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
File:Wiedehopf mit Puppe als Futter.jpg, featured
Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 23:54:24 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Upupidae_(Hoopoes)
Info created & uploaded by Sven Damerow – nominated by Alu -- Alu (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Alu (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Good catch by the photographer and the bird, which is pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:42, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Yann (talk) 09:40, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
* Signature missing --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:39, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support 10:59, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support A wonderful picture, both the subject and the background. Alvesgaspar (talk) 14:38, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:13, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Absolute --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:39, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 17:57, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Great pose. – Aristeas (talk) 18:54, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 06:45, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:02, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 14:35, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 21:08, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support - Tisha Mukherjee (talk) 06:39, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:19, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:53, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Llez (talk) 10:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης (talk) 20:13, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Paramanu Sarkar (talk) 06:33, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 21:16:11 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/1900s#1980-1989
Info I just cannot believe that this beautiful and powerful photo wasn't yet FP nor VI, guys... (I tought it was in the past, really strange... maybe just on local wikipedia projects; I just stumbled on it after some year and immediately nominated it now)/// created by the DoD-USAF – uploaded by Makthorpe & TomStar81 (current high res.) – nominated by LucaLindholm -- LucaLindholm (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- LucaLindholm (talk) 21:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Yeah, this is a striking sight, and before anyone says it's not that sharp, is it sharp enough to you for a 1984 photo of such a sight? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:44, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support This used to be my profile picture in school! Fascinating photograph with the conflict of colors and texture. GGOTCC (talk) 07:49, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like the too tight crop, especially on the left side. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:55, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose The crop. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:54, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Very good quality for 1984 and has a wow factor for me. Юрий Д.К. 08:23, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Lots of potential here but per above, crop and also lack of sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 10:12, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Tight crop. Should be all in. --Mile (talk) 17:31, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Weak oppose Composition/crop aren't that much an issue to me. Resolution however is poor. --Aciarium (talk) 14:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Impressive shot and high value. --Selbymay (talk) 22:07, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:08, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others. --Yann (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Historically impressive. ★ 17:58, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 17:20:02 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
Info Pedra Azul (Portuguese for "Blue Stone"), in the Pedra Azul State Park, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support The cloudy sky is not a problem here, in my opinion. -- ★ 17:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Good quality and a remarkable geological formation. I agree that the cloudy sky isn’t a problem here. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:54, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- It is one of the most iconic landmarks in the Brazilian state of Espírito Santo. ★ 19:43, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- I hope to visit it one day. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Comment Rather soft at 1:1 zoom. The hill shape reminds me of Syntaxys's File:2009-08-27 D100-08 Achim-Lammerts Estergebirge-Krottenkopf.jpg. JayCubby (talk) 20:58, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- The main difference: the Syntaxys's image compositionally centers on the gap of the Krottenkopf; here we have a centered crop of another peak itself. ★ 22:57, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- I see a sine wave in both. JayCubby (talk) 23:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- The crest and trough! Lol ★ 00:42, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- I see a sine wave in both. JayCubby (talk) 23:21, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
- The main difference: the Syntaxys's image compositionally centers on the gap of the Krottenkopf; here we have a centered crop of another peak itself. ★ 22:57, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Well, specially dealing with one of the most iconic landmarks in the state it deserves a better pictures. This one is grey, with a centered/boring composition, detail is low and the POV is not the best, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 10:14, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Not QI level of quality and mediocre light conditions. But an interesting formation. --A.Savin 18:56, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per others. My apologies, but other than the rock itself, nothing strikes me as outstanding about this photo, neither the sharpness, the light, the background nor even the crop on the left, where the incline does not help the composition. Although there are also issues of quality (that is, not FP) and the crops are a little tight left and right in File:Caminho para a Pedra Azul.jpg, I prefer its composition. I really hope this remark doesn't come across as insulting and that you instead see it as a challenge to try to continue photographing this landmark and working to produce a really wonderful result that will be an FP, and I look forward to seeing it! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:35, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: so I don't understand why this photo was promoted to QI. What's happening in that section? ★ 12:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- I couldn't say because I haven't been frequenting QIC, but it seems like FPC has higher standards. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:30, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: so I don't understand why this photo was promoted to QI. What's happening in that section? ★ 12:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Thank you to everyone who reviewed it. Fortunately, there's already a FP of the spot. ★ 01:16, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 12:15:39 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Sweden
Info Former firestation in Vaxholm after heavy snowfall with the old bell tower and water tower in the background. I am very happy with the composition here, with the three red towers and the contrast with the white snow. Created, uploaded and nominated by-- ArildV (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:13, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 15:29, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Picturesque and well-composed. – Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose It's a pretty house with snow, but I miss something else here to consider it extraordinary. Sorry Arild Poco a poco (talk) 10:16, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:01, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:14, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Nice house, but trees are spoiling compo. Also left part isnt so convincing. --Mile (talk) 08:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 07:15:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United Kingdom
Info Autumn landscape at Loch Tummel, Perth and Kinross, Scotland. Created by Eric Kilby – uploaded/nominated by me. Юрий Д.К. 07:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Юрий Д.К. 07:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Nice reflection, beautiful colors. --Yann (talk) 10:22, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:01, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support That's just so appealing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 06:52, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose I miss the necessary sharpness --Berthold Werner (talk) 16:41, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Glorious colours and reflection. --Tagooty (talk) 08:41, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose Agree, a great view but disappointing sharpness, clearly below FP level. A shame. Poco a poco (talk) 10:15, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Done The photo has been denoised carefully. Юрий Д.К. 10:55, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:46, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support This version is acceptable. Beautiful autumn atmosphere.--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 23:14, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Oppose per Berthold Werner and Poco a poco, unfortunately, the image is motion blurred, and with a JPG as the basis, it is almost impossible to repair. But it is a beautiful image that radiates a great deal of tranquility. --Achim Lammerts • Syntaxys (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
- Although I agree that the sharpness may be better, I doubt that it is a motion blur. Z9 has an internal image stabilizer and it gives ability to take sharp photos with much longer exposures than 1/40. In regard to the photo, I would use f/8-f/10 and higher ISO, rather than f/4 and ISO 400. May be the author has wanted to avoid excess noise here and sacrificed sharpness, after all, the lighting conditions were quite difficult. Юрий Д.К. 08:44, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- JackyM59 (talk) 19:40, 10 March 2026 (UTC)
Support-- Nice view Umarxon III (talk) 02:33, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --heylenny (talk/edits) 23:44, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Mar 2026 at 02:03:16 (UTC) (unless closed by the 5th-day rule)
Voters must check: File name · Quality · Image description · License · Categories (what, where, who, when)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft
Info What if... the nuclear wessels were in the air? That's what the US Air Force attempted to explore in the 1950s with the Convair NB-36H, which carried a nuclear reactor to test its shielding and show the feasibility of a nuclear-powered bomber. Ultimately, after fifteen years, they never got around to actually powering an aircraft with a nuclear reactor, and John F. Kennedy killed the program. Created by the United States Air Force – uploaded and nominated by Crisco 1492 -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Historical importance, cannot be taken again. Yann (talk) 10:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Also a good photo with an excellent composition and well denoised. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:05, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕️ 16:14, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:34, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 11:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)
Support Valuable motif, good execution, pleasing to look at. --Aciarium (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:38, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
Timetable (day 5 after nomination)
Mon 09 Mar → Sat 14 Mar Tue 10 Mar → Sun 15 Mar Wed 11 Mar → Mon 16 Mar Thu 12 Mar → Tue 17 Mar Fri 13 Mar → Wed 18 Mar Sat 14 Mar → Thu 19 Mar
Timetable (day 9 after nomination, last day of voting)
Thu 05 Mar → Sat 14 Mar Fri 06 Mar → Sun 15 Mar Sat 07 Mar → Mon 16 Mar Sun 08 Mar → Tue 17 Mar Mon 09 Mar → Wed 18 Mar Tue 10 Mar → Thu 19 Mar Wed 11 Mar → Fri 20 Mar Thu 12 Mar → Sat 21 Mar Fri 13 Mar → Sun 22 Mar Sat 14 Mar → Mon 23 Mar
Closing nominations manually
The following description explains how to close nominations manually. Normally this is not necessary, as FPCBot takes care of counting the votes, closing and archiving the nominations. When the Bot has counted the votes, a user needs to check and approve the result; everything else is done by the Bot. Therefore, the following instructions are normally only needed for delist-and-replace nominations that the Bot cannot (yet) process, and in case the Bot malfunctions. The closing can be done by any experienced user. If you need help, just ask on the FPC talk page.
Closing a featured picture nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the nomination, then [edit].
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
{{FPC-results-reviewed|support=x|oppose=x|neutral=x|featured=(“yes” or “no”)|gallery=xxx|sig=~~~~}}
(You can leave thegalleryparameter blank if the image was not featured. If the nomination contains alternatives, you must add thealternative=xxxparameter with the name of the selected image between thegalleryand thesigparameter. See {{FPC-results-reviewed}} for examples and more explanations.) - Edit the title of the nomination and add
featuredornot featuredafter the link – for example:
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes
=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], featured === - Save your edit.
- Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):
- If it is featured:
- Add the picture to the list of the four most recently featured pictures of an appropriate gallery of Commons:Featured pictures, list as the first one and delete the last one, so that the number is four again.
- Add the picture to the appropriate featured picture gallery page and section. Click on the most appropriate link beneath where you just added it as one of the four images on Commons:Featured pictures, list to find the gallery page, and search for the correct section. (An image should only appear ONE time in the galleries. After a successful nomination, the image can be placed in several of the Featured pictures categories.)
- Add the template
{{Assessments|featured=1}}to the image description page.- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
com-nomparameter. For example, if File:Foo.jpg was promoted in the nominationCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bar.jpg, use{{Assessments|featured=1|com-nom=Bar.jpg}}You also need thecom-nomparameter if the image gets renamed. - If the image is already featured on another Wikipedia, just add
featured=1to the {{Assessments}} template. For instance,{{Assessments|enwiki=1}}becomes{{Assessments|enwiki=1|featured=1}}
- If it was an alternative image or part of a set nomination, use the
- Head over to the structured data for the image and add the “Commons quality assessment” claim (P6731) “Wikimedia Commons featured picture” (Q63348049).
- Add the picture to the chronological archives of featured pictures. Place it at the end of the gallery using this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Title'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|xxx}}, {{o|xxx}}, {{n|xxx}}- The
#should be replaced by 1 for the first image nominated that month, and counts up after that. Have a look at the other entries on that page for examples. (If you want to do everything perfectly, link that number to the nomination subpage, just like FPCBot does this. It allows users to jump directly to the nomination.) - The
Titleshould be replaced by the bare name of the featured picture, without the ‘File:’ or the file extension (such as .jpg .tif .svg). - The
xin{{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}should be replaced by the count of support, oppose, and neutral votes respectively. - If the nomination was a set nomination, use this format:
File:xxxxx.jpg|# '''Set: Title (Z files)'''<br>created by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], uploaded by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]], nominated by [[User:xxxxx|xxxxx]]<br> {{s|x}}, {{o|x}}, {{n|x}}
Replace theZin(Z files)by the count of images in the set, and use the name of the first image from the set instead ofFile:xxxxx.jpgand for the title.
- The
- Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotion|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the nominator. For set nominations, use:== Set Promoted to FP ==, using the names of the set files instead of the XXXXXX and the title of the set instead of YYYYY.
<gallery>
File:XXXXXX.jpg
File:XXXXXX.jpg
</gallery>
{{FPpromotionSet2|YYYYY}} - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedUploader|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the user who has uploaded the image, if that user is not the same as the nominator. - Add
== FP promotion ==
{{FPpromotedCreator|File:XXXXX.jpg}}to the talk page of the creator, if the author is a different Commons user than nominator and uploader.
- As the last step (whether the image is featured or not; including {{FPX}}-d, {{FPD}}-d and {{Withdraw}}-n nominations), you have to move the transclusion (the {{ }} and the text within those) of the nomination to the current log page.
- To find the current log page, visit the first page of the log for this month. If the header of that page contains a link with the text “Next part of this month”, the log for this month has been split into several parts because it contains too many entries. Click on the “Next part …” link and repeat this until you reach a page where the header does not offer a “Next part …” link; that’s the last and current log page.
- Now open Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list, click on [edit], and find the transclusion of the nomination you are closing. It will be of the form:
{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XXXXX.jpg}}or:{{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/XXXXX}}. - Copy that line to the bottom of the current log page and save that page. Then remove the same line from the candidate list and save that page.
Closing a delisting nomination
- On Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list click on the title/link of the candidate image, then [edit].
Add the result of the voting at the bottom (on a new line):{{FPC-delist-results-reviewed|delist=x|keep=x|neutral=x|delisted=yes/no|sig=~~~~}}
(for example see Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Ensifera ensifera (22271195865).jpg) - Edit the title of the delisting nomination and add
delistedornot delistedafter the image title; for example:=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]] ===
becomes=== [[:File:XXXXX.jpg]], delisted === - Move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
- If the outcome was not delisted, stop here. If it is delisted:
- Remove the picture from Commons:Featured pictures, list and any subpages.
- Edit the picture's description as follows:
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
featured=1tofeatured=2(do not remove the {{Assessments}} template; do not change anything related to its status in other featured picture processes). If the image description page uses the old {{Featured picture}} template, replace it with{{Assessments|featured=2}}. - Remove the image from all categories beginning with "Featured [pictures]" (example: Featured night photography, Featured pictures from Wiki Loves Monuments 2016, Featured pictures of Paris); but not from categories about featured pictures on specific Wikipedia editions, like Category:Featured pictures on Wikipedia, English.
- Remove the "Commons quality assessment" claim (P6731) "Wikimedia Commons featured picture" (Q63348049) from the picture's Structured data.
- In the {{Assessments}} template on the image description page, change
- Add a delisting-comment to the original entry in the chronological archive of featured pictures in bold-face, e. g. delisted 2007-07-19 (1–6) with (1–6) meaning 1 keep and 6 delist votes (change as appropriate). The picture must not be removed from the chronological archives.
- If this is a Delist and Replace, the delisting and promotion must both be done manually. To do the promotion, follow the steps in the section above. Note that the assessment tag on the file page and the promotion tag on the nominator's talk page won't pick up the /replace subpage that these nominations use.
Archiving a withdrawn nomination
If a nomination has been withdrawn by the nominator by using {{Withdraw}} or is cancelled with {{FPX}} or {{FPD}}, wait 24 hours after the nomination was last edited. If there has been no objection to the cancellation within this time, the nomination can simply be archived. Just move the transclusion of the nomination to the current log page; please see above for an explanation how to find the current log page and how to move the nomination to it.
