Jump to content

Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Shortcuts: COM:ANV • COM:AVI • COM:AIV

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
128, 127, 126, 125, 124, 123, 122, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

To create a report, please click on the button above and fill the fields. Alternatively you may copy the following template, replacing USER/TEMP ACCOUNT and REASON with your content, and place it at the bottom of this page:

{{subst:Report vandal|USER/TEMP ACCOUNT|REASON. ~~~~}}

Ladhar tribe

[edit]

User: Ladhar tribe (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Please revoke TPA for spam (diff). The account was indeffed while under a 31-hour block for userpage abuse after I asked the two administrators at the block notice thread to indef it (it is a sock of an indeffed en.wp spammer; see Special:CentralAuth/Ladhar tribe).

Though the diff I supplied is nominally a beg for unblocking, I don't trust it given the user's continuous spam of their talk page (see its history). I am here to avoid the talk page, which they would otherwise see and perhaps overwhelm with more spam. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 08:51, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done. Indefinitely blocked. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Taivo: I meant revoking TPA Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 09:33, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, my mistake. I reblocked the user, removing talkpage accesse for 2 weeks, but I do not remove his/her talkpage access indefinitely to give the user possibility to request unblock. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
:) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 12:07, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oh yeah, not 31 hours, 3 days (I recalled incorrectly lol) Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 12:08, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

State Bank of India Goa

[edit]

User: State Bank of India Goa (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Lock evasion: Special:CentralAuth/State_Bank_Indian XReport --PieWriter (talk) 12:15, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done Blocked indef., spam deleted. Yann (talk) 12:25, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Now globally locked. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 12:49, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Name choose creation

[edit]

User: Name choose creation (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Vandalism XReport --MathXplore (talk) 13:08, 10 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

(not administrator)
Already done: globally locked. Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 02:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

~2026-15475-55

[edit]

User: ~2026-15475-55 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Vandalism. Sascha (talk) 07:13, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Promotional content only, spamming YouTube video links. I believe a block is in order. Shaan SenguptaTalk 07:31, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
✓ Done: LTA blocked indef as usual. --Achim55 (talk) 08:27, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

邵成鑫1225

[edit]

User: 邵成鑫1225 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: User:邵成鑫1007's yet another sock. XReport --Sakurase (talk) 07:50, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Already done: Globally locked by EPIC. --Achim55 (talk) 08:29, 11 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Kamaalhirsi1

[edit]

User: Kamaalhirsi1 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: vandalism edits; may be multiple accounts Prototyperspective (talk) 00:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

See also Special:Contributions/Ahmedderiaguled. Prototyperspective (talk) 00:27, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Already done: Globally locked by Vermont. --Achim55 (talk) 07:51, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

El pepe mclovin

[edit]

User: El pepe mclovin (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Vandalism only account GPinkerton (talk) 05:33, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done. I warned the user. Both edits are reverted. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Cicihwahyuni6

[edit]

User: Cicihwahyuni6 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: cluttering Watchlists and hiding changes by adding unnecessary spaces to lots of articles Prototyperspective (talk) 13:42, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Lois976

[edit]

User: Lois976 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: filing purely vexatious rapid-fire deletion requests with the rationale “porn propaganda” Dronebogus (talk) 17:53, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for a month for inappropriate removals of DR page contents, speedy-deletion templates, etc. related to their own uploads. I didn't particularly look into what Dronebogus raises here, and a longer block might well be in order. I just figured I'd stop them doing damage for now on the basis of what I could quickly find. - Jmabel ! talk 20:01, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Jmabel: See also the personal attacks in Special:Diff/1179967175, Special:Diff/1179961808, and Special:Diff/1179967175.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:21, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
  • Certainly uncivil, but when someone (Dronebogus) is already in a fight with a user (Lois976) over one issue and then opens up an unrelated deletion request for a bunch of that user's uploads and, it appears, gets it wrong, it is not surprising that the latter user gets angry. Nothing there there gets past the one-month block they already got form messing with the DR, in my opinion. - Jmabel ! talk 21:21, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
They nominated my userpage and talk page for deletion with similar nonsense rationales, made obviously false claims of copyright violation on other files I uploaded, and re-nominated the same files over and over when I reverted their nominations as trolling. I think an indef is in order here. Dronebogus (talk) 20:26, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
I agree that was egregious, and if some other admin thinks an indef-block is more appropriate than the 1 month I gave, then I will not object. I don't think there is any point to anything between the two. Either there is a chance that they will come back to the project and contribute appropriately, or there isn't. If there is, a month is enough to make the point. If not, then indef is in order. - Jmabel ! talk 21:28, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Either this took place before Lois976' (admittedly bad) behaviour, but does provide a certain explanation of it, although not a justification.
Or else it took place after the conflict had begun, in which case it's an obvious retaliation on your part. Yet you're not the one getting blocked here?
If you throw around complaints like made obviously false claims of copyright violation on other files I uploaded and yet you're doing bulk DRs across an editor's whole upload history, to DR files that have been here since 2012 as 'might be AI', then you might find some surprising support for your I think an indef is in order here. suggestion. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:03, 12 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Natashaputin

[edit]

Draft2526

[edit]

User: Draft2526 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Long-term abuse. Category:Sockpuppets of Balakumar252600 per User:Draft2526 XReport --MathXplore (talk) 14:14, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

✓ Done. User is globally locked. Uploads are nominated for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Mechi4895

[edit]

User: Mechi4895 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Spam uploads / edits only ReneeWrites (talk) 19:28, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done seems to have stopped with your warnings. Anything further along these lines would merit a block. - Jmabel ! talk 03:18, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

JeanFousrou52

[edit]

User: JeanFousrou52 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: JeanFousrou52 shows the same behavior and editing interests as a series of previous sockpuppets of User:Đăng Đàn Cung. The account creates and edits the same kind of unusual, loosely defined categories. This strongly appears to be another sockpuppet of that user. -- Jakubhal 21:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Jakubhal: Already done blocked and locked.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 22:10, 13 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

2067邵成鑫

[edit]

User: 2067邵成鑫 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: User:邵成鑫1007's sock. XReport --Sakurase (talk) 07:25, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Already done: Globally locked. --Achim55 (talk) 08:45, 14 March 2026 (UTC)Reply